1. The judge purported to apply the Bardal principles but completely ignored the age issue.
2. Awarding $2,000 for aggravated damages is so modest as to be irrelevant, especially when he found that the plaintiffs were fired because they filed a complaint with the appropriate govt authority. He also denied them punitive damages.
3. Damages are to be calculated on gross income, not net. These damages are now subject to be taxed a second time as this is taxable income.
4. The judge also denied the claim against the personal owner. As this case was undefended, it seems unlikely that the plaintiff will ever recover anything.
My Comments: