Court Upholds Arbitration Clause that Requires Adjudication in Texas :

In Morrison v Ericsson Canada ( 2016 ONSC 3908 Madame Justice Darla Wilson was faced with a dispute over a sales plan that contained the  following clause:

H. Arbitration. Should the participant be dissatisfied with the final outcome of the Dispute Resolution procedure, the participant and Ericsson agree that any dispute or controversy arising under or concerning this Plan (including the payment and amounts of commissions and bonuses) shall be settled by final and binding arbitration in the City of Dallas, Texas in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association…. The participant’s and Ericsson’s signature upon the participant’s Goal Sheet reflects the parties’ agreement to be bound by this arbitration provision.

As the employee was not paid what he felt he was owed, he claimed that he was constructively dismissed and sued both for the commission owing as well as damages for wrongful dismissal.

The Court found that they were obligated to enforce the choice of arbitration and dismissed the lawsuit.

The final paragraphs of the judgement says it all :

23 In my opinion, the matters at issue fall directly within the terms of the SIP agreement, which requires that if a dispute arising out of the agreement cannot be resolved, the parties must arbitrate the dispute in Texas. The Plaintiff cannot avail himself of the appeal procedures specified in the agreement and when he does not like the decisions rendered, choose to abandon the final dispute mechanism that is set out and which he agreed to. The arbitration has not taken place because the Plaintiff has refused to participate. The fact that it might be inconvenient or expensive for Morrison to arbitrate in Texas is not a compelling reason to find that he ought to be permitted to pursue the Ontario action. Even if there were an issue of whether the dispute was properly sent to the arbitrator, which was not an argument advanced before me, the matter must be referred to the arbitrator for that determination. In my view, the issues Morrison complains of arise from his employment and in particular arise from the administration of the SIP program and as such, he must proceed to arbitration in accordance with the agreement.
Conclusion
24 The motion of the Defendant is granted. The Ontario action is stayed and the Plaintiff is directed to proceed with arbitration of his dispute in accordance with the terms of the agreement he signed.

As the judge noted, this was not a case involving the issue of forum conveniens or choice of law. Once Section 7 of the  Arbitration Act, 1991 is invoked, there is no discretion in the Court to allow a lawsuit to continue. That section reads as follows:

If a party to an arbitration agreement commences a proceeding in respect of a matter to be submitted to arbitration under the agreement, the court in which the proceeding is commenced shall, on the motion of another party to the arbitration agreement, stay the proceeding.

Therefore it is incumbent on lawyers for both parties to closely examine these types of agreements to see whether an arbitration clause is applicable. Arbitration clauses are quite common in US based employment agreements, where they are used primarily to avoid crazy jury verdicts.

145 thoughts on “Court Upholds Arbitration Clause that Requires Adjudication in Texas :”

  1. Pingback: how to get cialis
  2. Pingback: Pfizer viagra
  3. Pingback: viagra suppliers
  4. Pingback: cialis cost
  5. Pingback: ed pills
  6. Pingback: cheapest ed pills
  7. Pingback: men's ed pills
  8. Pingback: buy cialis
  9. Pingback: cvs pharmacy
  10. Pingback: canadian pharmacy
  11. Pingback: cialis generic
  12. Pingback: cheap levitra
  13. Pingback: vardenafil 10mg
  14. Pingback: best casino online
  15. Pingback: slot machine games
  16. Pingback: cash payday
  17. Pingback: personal loan
  18. Pingback: cash payday
  19. Pingback: 5 mg cialis
  20. Pingback: cialis 20
  21. Pingback: olivia
  22. Pingback: cialis internet
  23. Pingback: Mybookie
  24. Pingback: cialis to buy
  25. Pingback: cialis internet
  26. Pingback: generic for cialis
  27. Pingback: order viagra
  28. Pingback: play casino
  29. Pingback: online gambling
  30. Pingback: generic sildenafil
  31. Pingback: sildenafil dosage
  32. Pingback: sildenafil 20
  33. Pingback: viagra price
  34. Pingback: cialis dosage
  35. Pingback: viagra
  36. Pingback: viagra canada
  37. Pingback: viagra vs cialis
  38. Pingback: viagra cost
  39. Pingback: buy viagra
  40. Pingback: cialis 20mg
  41. Pingback: casino world
  42. Pingback: propecia online
  43. Pingback: viagra
  44. Pingback: viagra female buy
  45. Pingback: generic sildenafil
  46. Pingback: buy viagra generic
  47. Pingback: buy viagra generic
  48. Pingback: Viagra 120mg usa
  49. Pingback: buy sildenafil
  50. Pingback: cialis generic
  51. Pingback: buy generic viagra
  52. Pingback: cheap Cialis 10mg
  53. Pingback: generic cialis
  54. Pingback: Cialis 20mg canada
  55. Pingback: canadian viagra
  56. Pingback: buy Cialis 60 mg
  57. Pingback: cheap viagra
  58. Pingback: buy viagra online
  59. Pingback: cheap Cialis 60 mg
  60. Pingback: Cialis 10mg tablet
  61. Pingback: levitra 10 mg uk
  62. Pingback: generic viagra
  63. Pingback: propecia 5mg nz
  64. Pingback: viagra online
  65. Pingback: actos 15mg pills
  66. Pingback: antabuse 250mg usa
  67. Pingback: arava 20mg tablet
  68. Pingback: price of cialis
  69. Pingback: arimidex 1mg usa
  70. Pingback: tadalafil
  71. Pingback: atarax 25 mg price
  72. Pingback: generic pills
  73. Pingback: avapro 150 mg cost
  74. Pingback: buy tadalafil

Leave a Reply