Handbook Containing Termination Clause not Binding:

In Cheong v Grand Pacific  Travel &Trade, ( 2016 BCSC 1321) Justice Warren held that a Employee Handbook containing a ESA only termination provision was unenforceable for the following reasons:

1) The handbook came into existance after the Plaintiff was hired and no consideration was provided for her giving up her common law right to reasonable notice upon termination.

2) The handbook did not state that it intended to be a contractual agreement.

3) As the handbook provided that the Employer could unilaterally ” repeal, amend , modify add to or delete from the handbook at any time” the Court found that this is inconsistent with a contract as ” It almost goes without saying that a contract cannot be unilaterally varied “.

4) Many of the provisions refer to theft that the Company” may” provide this or that but is not required to do so. The Court commented that ” Such discretionary language is not reflective of a contract document but, rather, a document intended for informational purposes only”.

5) There was no manifest acceptance by the employee, i.e. her signature acknowledging that she was bound by the terms of the handbook. Nor did her silence constitute acceptance.

I find  the third reason the most interesting as almost every employee handbook I have ever read contains such a boilerplate clause. Moreover some handbooks, especially US based ones, contain an express clause stating that” nothing in this handbook is intended to create a contractual relationship”. This is often mixed in with a clause reinterating the American “at will” concept.

It is now open to counsel to argue that these seemingly boilerplate clauses have the effect of making the booklet unenforceable at least in regards to the enforceability of the termination clause.

There is simply no substitute for  clearly setting out in the employment agreement at the time of hiring the termination provisions that the parties agree on. Why employers continue to try to limit their termination obligations in anything other than the proper way always amazes me.

 

126 thoughts on “Handbook Containing Termination Clause not Binding:”

  1. Pingback: viagra store
  2. Pingback: cheap cialis
  3. Pingback: cialis canada
  4. Pingback: is cialis generic
  5. Pingback: Rx generic viagra
  6. Pingback: Levitra or viagra
  7. Pingback: generic ventolin
  8. Pingback: cialis coupon cvs
  9. Pingback: cialis 20mg price
  10. Pingback: viagra generic
  11. Pingback: viagra generic
  12. Pingback: viagra 100mg
  13. Pingback: male ed pills
  14. Pingback: ed medications
  15. Pingback: www.cialis.com
  16. Pingback: canada pharmacy
  17. Pingback: canada pharmacy
  18. Pingback: cialis visa
  19. Pingback: generic cialis
  20. Pingback: levitra pills
  21. Pingback: online levitra
  22. Pingback: buy levitra
  23. Pingback: cash advance
  24. Pingback: short term loans
  25. Pingback: installment loans
  26. Pingback: viagra 100mg
  27. Pingback: real online casino
  28. Pingback: generic cialis
  29. Pingback: 5 mg cialis
  30. Pingback: cialis 20
  31. Pingback: 5 mg cialis
  32. Pingback: casino slot
  33. Pingback: casinos
  34. Pingback: what is viagra
  35. Pingback: sildenafil citrate
  36. Pingback: tadalafil 5 mg
  37. Pingback: buy propecia
  38. Pingback: buy sildenafil
  39. Pingback: generic sildenafil
  40. Pingback: cialis online usa
  41. Pingback: Viagra 200 mg usa
  42. Pingback: buy sildenafil
  43. Pingback: liquid cialis
  44. Pingback: cheap cialis
  45. Pingback: generic viagra
  46. Pingback: buy viagra
  47. Pingback: Cialis 10 mg cheap
  48. Pingback: viagra
  49. Pingback: Cialis 40mg price
  50. Pingback: canadian pharmacy
  51. Pingback: viagra prices
  52. Pingback: viagra substitute
  53. Pingback: abilify 10mg otc
  54. Pingback: cost of actos 30mg
  55. Pingback: viagra 50mg prices
  56. Pingback: cheap aricept 10mg
  57. Pingback: cheap tadalafil
  58. Pingback: cialis reviews
  59. Pingback: buy avapro 150 mg
  60. Pingback: cialis in ireland

Leave a Reply