Sucessor Employer under ESA not the Same as under the Common Law:

In Carpenter v Brains II ( 2015 CarswellOnt 15542) the Employer went through a CCAA reorganization in which a new company bought some of the assets and employed some of the employees of the previous company. Even though under the ESA the new company was a successor to the old ( and thus she had 17 years service ) under the common law test in Sorel v Tomenson Saunders, [1987] 15 BCLR ( 2d) 38 (CA), the implied term of continuous service was offset by the facts in the case, so she only got credit for 6.5 years. Her notice period was 8 months.

Stinson J listed the following factors in deciding that the implied term of continuous service after a asset sale did not apply :

1) the insolvency of the former employer.

2) the application under the CCAA

3) the termination of her employment by the former employer

4) her hiring on a temporary basis by the CRO ( like a trustee in bankruptcy)

5) the termination of her employment by the CRO

6) the purchase of some but not all of the assets of the former employer by the new employer

7) the provisions of a contract with the new employer which purported to limit her termination entitlements to the ESA, even though the judge found that the clause was illegal as it did not provide for benefits upon termination.

8) Even though the plaintiff continued to perform her same functions despite the change of employer, it was obvious that it was not “business as usual”

My only concern with the judges’ reasoning is that, having found that the ESA only termination clause is unenforceable as it violated the ESA by not including benefits, he then resurrects the same clause for another purpose.

The leading case in this area is Machtinger v HOJ ( 1992 1 SCR 986) in which it clearly states a provision that tries to contract out of the ESA is ” null and void”. If something is” null and void “it is as it it did not exist . How then can something that legally does not exist still affect the legal relationship of the parties?

Unfortunately this is not the first  time that judges have taken into account the existence of an null and void provision and drawn from that document some meaning about the true intention of the parties. This is exactly what the SCC told us not to do in Machtinger. In that case the employer was trying to say that even though the contract was illegal, we could still use it as a guide to determine the true intent of the parties. The SCC soundly rejected that theory and said that the illegal clause could have no effect on ousting the implied term of reasonable notice or implying that the notice period should be a modest one.

 

352 thoughts on “Sucessor Employer under ESA not the Same as under the Common Law:”

  1. Pingback: cialis discount
  2. Pingback: Viagra approved
  3. Pingback: pills for ed
  4. Pingback: canadian pharmacy
  5. Pingback: cialis visa
  6. Pingback: generic levitra
  7. Pingback: order vardenafil
  8. Pingback: sildenafil 100mg
  9. Pingback: casinos
  10. Pingback: personal loan
  11. Pingback: personal loans
  12. Pingback: viagra pills
  13. Pingback: cialis buy
  14. Pingback: cialis 5 mg
  15. Pingback: cialis internet
  16. Pingback: free viagra
  17. Pingback: slots real money
  18. Pingback: cheap viagra
  19. Pingback: when to buy viagra
  20. Pingback: Viagra 25mg price
  21. Pingback: cialis dose
  22. Pingback: buy Viagra 200 mg
  23. Pingback: buy cialis online
  24. Pingback: buy viagra
  25. Pingback: viagra online
  26. Pingback: rx trust pharm
  27. Pingback: Cialis 60mg cost
  28. Pingback: Cialis 40mg usa
  29. Pingback: buy cialis
  30. Pingback: order lasix 100 mg
  31. Pingback: lexapro 20mg uk
  32. Pingback: viagra cost
  33. Pingback: actos 15mg pills
  34. Pingback: amaryl 2mg tablet
  35. Pingback: cialis generic
  36. Pingback: aricept 5 mg cost
  37. Pingback: viagra directions
  38. Pingback: cialistodo.com
  39. Pingback: cialis young men
  40. Pingback: best viagra prices
  41. Pingback: tadalafil
  42. Pingback: buspar 10mg nz
  43. Pingback: buy cheap viagra
  44. Pingback: cardizem 180 mg nz
  45. Pingback: real viagra sites
  46. Pingback: celexa 10mg uk
  47. Pingback: cipro medication
  48. Pingback: cialis online
  49. Pingback: slot machines
  50. Pingback: casino games
  51. Pingback: casino online
  52. Pingback: ED Pills
  53. Pingback: viagra wikipedia
  54. Pingback: cialis online
  55. Pingback: car insurances
  56. Pingback: cialis 20mg pills
  57. Pingback: cialis online
  58. Pingback: rbc car insurance
  59. Pingback: payday loan help
  60. Pingback: cbd oil
  61. Pingback: buy levitra in uk
  62. Pingback: viagra 4 tablets
  63. Pingback: clonidine uk
  64. Pingback: cialis three way
  65. Pingback: combivent nz
  66. Pingback: coreg 6,25 mg uk
  67. Pingback: cialis
  68. Pingback: compazine 5 mg uk
  69. Pingback: coumadin for sale
  70. Pingback: cialis istanbul
  71. Pingback: cozaar usa
  72. Pingback: thesisbyd.com
  73. Pingback: viagra and women
  74. Pingback: viagra women
  75. Pingback: essay on service
  76. Pingback: cheap dapsone caps
  77. Pingback: ddavp 10mcg canada
  78. Pingback: buy diamox 250mg
  79. Pingback: buy differin 15g
  80. Pingback: cheap diltiazem
  81. Pingback: doxycycline canada
  82. Pingback: dramamine online
  83. Pingback: cheapest elavil
  84. Pingback: flomax price
  85. Pingback: generic Nolvadex
  86. Pingback: buy cialis
  87. Pingback: how to buy imdur
  88. Pingback: cialis buy online
  89. Pingback: imitrex tablets
  90. Pingback: websites
  91. Pingback: indocin prices
  92. Pingback: lopressor tablet
  93. Pingback: luvox 50mg uk
  94. Pingback: meclizine tablet
  95. Pingback: viagra in dublin
  96. Pingback: cheapest mobic
  97. Pingback: Malegra DXT
  98. Pingback: Zovirax
  99. Pingback: motrin medication
  100. Pingback: prevacid prices
  101. Pingback: prilosec 10 mg nz
  102. Pingback: procardia pills
  103. Pingback: cheap viagra
  104. Pingback: proscar otc
  105. Pingback: buy protonix
  106. Pingback: provigil uk
  107. Pingback: pulmicort usa
  108. Pingback: reglan 10 mg otc
  109. Pingback: revatio medication
  110. Pingback: 44329 benadryl
  111. Pingback: robaxin medication
  112. Pingback: rogaine 5% cheap
  113. Pingback: skelaxin nz
  114. Pingback: spiriva 9mcg cost
  115. Pingback: viagra cheap
  116. Pingback: verapamil nz
  117. Pingback: wellbutrin otc
  118. Pingback: Visit Your URL
  119. Pingback: zyloprim australia
  120. Pingback: zyvox 600 mg uk
  121. Pingback: sildenafil generic
  122. Pingback: irbesartan generic
  123. Pingback: dutasteride pills
  124. Pingback: olmesartan cost
  125. Pingback: cialis debit card
  126. Pingback: clozapine pharmacy
  127. Pingback: carvedilol cost

Leave a Reply